Uncategorized

As Uranium One Investigation Heats up: Sessions gets Exposed

Attorney General Jeff Sessions told a small group of lawmakers in late September he was recused from appointing a special counsel to look into potential corruption….

By surrounding the Uranium One deal and Fusion GPS’s work on the Trump dossier, according to one of the lawmakers present.

Rep. Matt Gaetz: Told Reporters on Wednesday that he and other House Judiciary Committee Republicans had met with Sessions at the Justice Department on September 28 in advance of an upcoming committee hearing with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein later this month.

Gaetz said that when he asked Sessions to appoint a special counsel to investigate the 2010 Uranium One deal and Fusion GPS, the attorney general stood up, said he could not discuss the matter because he had recused himself, and walked out of the room, leaving them with a group of Rosenstein staffers “who showed no interest.”

Before leaving the room Sessions said “anything that had to do with 2016 election or Russia, or the candidates in the 2016 election, fell under the scope of his recusal, and he left the room,” Gaetz said. “It was Sessions’ position that his recusal on the Russia matter divorced him from any oversight on Uranium One and Fusion GPS. That’s troubling. Sessions’ recusal is a function of his involvement in the Trump campaign. In no world does that impact his judgment as it relates to Fusion GPS and Uranium One deal.

This is the reason President Donald Trump Remains Extremely Frustrated with the DOJ and Sessions himself.

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: Spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores said others in the room do not remember Sessions saying anything like that and that the subject was “discussed.” She would not comment on whether Sessions has recused himself.

She said in a statement to reporters: “I’ve talked to people who were in the room and they don’t remember him saying anything like this. The subject was discussed so maybe someone misconstrued what he said. I can’t comment on recusal issues though because to do so would confirm or deny the existence of an investigation,”

LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THIS IN THE COMMENTS BELOW AND PLEASE SHARE THIS REPORT

THANK YOU

One comment

Comments are closed.